You share the context
Use case, current state, constraints, team, data, and what would make the project valuable.
We help SaaS teams and software consultancies define, validate, and ship reliable, measurable, and profitable AI projects.
We reply in less than 48h
TenBeltz
Teams that want to introduce AI or fix a feature that already reached production with poor reliability, high cost, or weak operating criteria.
Teams that need sharper technical criteria to scope, sell, and deliver AI projects for their own clients without improvising architecture or requirements.
Problem
The issue is rarely adding a model. The issue is knowing what to build, what data is needed, and how to operate it without hurting product, margin, or trust.
No clear viability criteria for the use case
Built without enough data or evaluation coverage
Costs explode when traffic grows
Reliability breaks under real usage
No monitoring, safeguards, or failure signals
Projects sold without asking clients for what is needed
Value
TenBeltz is not an AI agency and not a generic consultancy. We define the case, structure the system, and help the team carry it into production with explicit delivery criteria.
We do not sell demos
We do not sell hours without context
We design AI systems that are:
Ways of working
Each mode fits a different project stage. This is the short version; the services page has the full detail.
Diagnosis to decide whether it is worth building and leave with a clear roadmap to deliver it.
Technical foundation for consultancies to scope, sell, and start AI projects with better criteria.
First working version of an agent or AI system, with a clear way to validate quality.
Full implementation through production, integrated with your product and ready to operate.
Next step
The first conversation is not a sales call disguised as diagnosis. We use it to understand whether there is a real technical fit.
Use case, current state, constraints, team, data, and what would make the project valuable.
If TenBeltz is not the right partner, we say it clearly before proposing anything.
Gap Analysis, Foundations, Agent MVP, Production Delivery, or no project for now.
You get a concrete next step instead of a vague proposal or a list of hours.
Deliverables
08 / artifacts
Clear viability decision
A go / no-go answer grounded in engineering, not intuition.
Recommended architecture
A system shape aligned with constraints, reliability, and margin.
Technology choices
Practical choices for providers, frameworks, and orchestration.
Data and dataset requirements
What is missing, what quality is needed, and how to structure it.
Reliability test set
A practical set of examples and criteria to measure whether the AI works well.
Observability plan
Signals, metrics, and alerts to monitor the system in production.
Risk map and safeguards
Failure modes and operating limits identified upfront.
Technical roadmap
Sequenced priorities so delivery stays clear and implementation does not drift.
Process
We keep the process simple: understand the context, design the system, validate with real criteria, and either ship it or support the internal team.
Context
We understand business constraints, product reality, and the specific use case.
System design
We define architecture, data needs, reliability checks, safeguards, and delivery path.
Validation
We ground decisions in measurable criteria instead of intuition or demo theater.
Production or handover
We either take it through delivery or hand over a clear path for your internal team to finish with confidence.
Fit
You are a SaaS or consultancy with real software delivery behind the AI ambition.
You need technical judgment, not a flashy prototype.
You care about reliability, observability, integration, and cost.
You want a technical team that can challenge scope before implementation starts.
You want a cheap prototype as fast as possible.
You want to add AI without a clear use case or owner.
You want to start building without defining success criteria first.
FAQ
Got another question and cannot find the answer? Write to us and we will get back to you as soon as possible.
We set the expected volume, the target cost per request, and the reliability metric before any code is written. That turns viability into an engineering decision instead of a hunch: you get an explicit go / no-go, a recommended architecture, and the data you will actually need. If cost per request will not survive traffic growth, better to know before building.
Automatic evals, a golden set, human review, and guardrails with fallback when the model fails. On the multi-agent system for expert legal reports we added a double anti-hallucination layer: deterministic rules for dates and inconsistencies against the medical assessment scale, plus automatic evaluation against real reports, section by section. Tracing, logs, and alerts run from day one.
Cheap routes, caching, batching, mixed models routed per task, and per-feature limits. The order matters: you do not cut costs by picking the cheap model, you cut them once your evaluation system proves the cheap one breaks nothing. That is how the legal report system reached −42% cost per report with no loss of precision, and how document classification held 95.5% top-5 accuracy with 17% fewer LLM calls.
Data classification, PII redaction, access policies, and full traceability. When requirements demand it, the deployment goes on-premise: that is how we built Irontec’s call-analysis platform, where speech engine and model choices were driven by privacy constraints, with asynchronous workers and Kubernetes. We also run on-premise AI in regulated environments such as ENS and the EU AI Act.
AI Gap Analysis is one context meeting, a written report, and a second meeting to walk through it: recommended stack, the data and datasets you will need, predictable risks, a phased roadmap, and a cost baseline. Agent MVP adds the first working version of the agent, a golden set, quality checks and monitoring, and an explicit guide to what is left for production.
Yes. We work with your product and engineering teams on the stack you already run, not a new one, and close with a technical handover and documentation so the system stays operable without us. With Qamarero it took several months of joint work to get the voice agents wired into their CRM and table management, running in production.
Share the context and we will tell you whether there is a strong fit and which way of working makes sense.
Share the context and we will assess whether there is a strong fit for TenBeltz.
Prefer to talk it through?
Book 30 min with Aritz